Non-contact resonance testing with the RFR, Part 2: Physical principles, booster effect and potential vortices

Non-contact resonance testing in bioenergetic testing methods with the aid of the

The distance of 30–45(50) cm between the tube and the patient described in Part 1 and specified by V. Benschoten, and the possibility in that arrangement of shielding solely with an indigo filter in front of the tube end or aluminium foil on the forehead, apply only to the arrangement he describes — one tube end without an internal electrode directly at the honeycomb — or to measurement using electrical instruments such as EAV. In these measuring arrangements, it is primarily the Hertzian transverse-wave component or the light-wave component — photons travelling at the speed of light — of information transmission that is detected: tunnelling is absent; see below.

If, on the other hand, the electrode normally used in the RFR is placed inside the tube, whether or not a cable is connected, shielding is unsuccessful, because in this arrangement the longitudinal-wave component with neutrino character — photons travelling faster than light — is the primary transfer medium, through tunnelling; see below. The other components are of relatively subordinate importance.

As already indicated in Part 1, the exchange of data between the patient and medications through the physician is mediated by vortices.

To understand a more detailed explanatory model, alongside quantum physics and quantum philosophy one can also draw analogies with scalar-wave physics and the theory of hydrotic potential vortices (K. Meyl), and thus with the experiments of Tesla, the discoverer of neutrino radiation (20) and the “father” of “free energy”, and their consequences.

First, therefore, the essentials of these experiments relevant to our subject, and of potential-vortex theory as part of the “theory of objectivity” developed by Meyl (19,20,22), will be summarised. It should be emphasised at this point that, through the physical, theoretical and experimental findings of quantum and scalar-wave physics, virtually the whole of so-called alternative medicine has for the first time become genuinely explicable in physical terms, comprehensible and scientifically reproducible.

The experiment (22) intended to demonstrate “free energy” and neutrino radiation — “neutrino power” according to Meyl — is as follows. K. Meyl, the developer of the “theory of objectivity” with a unified field theory in which elementary particles, such as electrons and positrons, and quanta exist as “potential vortices” or “elementary vortices” (Meyl; Fig. 2), has recently repeated it using current apparatus. It has recently been called into question again from an “official” quarter, the Institute for Gravitational Research (IGF) (61), because of questionable interpretations of the results in relation to scalar waves.

There is a transmitter, a frequency generator, and a receiver, each with an identically wound flat coil, or Tesla coil, an earth connection, a spherical antenna and light-emitting diodes as indicators. The frequency control on the generator is turned until an LED on the receiver lights up brightly and the one on the transmitter goes out. This means that, at that moment, energy is being transferred from the transmitter to the receiver. Depending on the receiver's natural frequency, the frequency control on the transmitter must be set differently to achieve the same effect.

If the receiver is disconnected, the lamp on the transmitter lights up again, indicating that a reaction upon the transmitter has occurred.

Even if the classical physical experimental results mentioned above are confirmed, one must not forget a fundamental insight of quantum philosophy: every experiment depends on the experimenter and their conception of the experiment, and the experimenter's mere unconscious intention to refute or confirm a particular result is enough for the result actually to turn out in that unconsciously desired direction.

Prof. H. Pietschmann (32), the well-known Viennese atomic physicist, once even said at a lecture I was privileged to attend: “Whatever is predicted theoretically will also be found experimentally, whether it exists or not.”

Whatever the outcome of the scientific dispute, the findings of Meyl, Bearden, cited in (28,53), and Warnke (10,111,13,14,53), as well as those of other authors, for example (12,56,57,62–65), help us explain the practical experiences gained in naturopathic and empirical medicine. If better explanatory models should one day become available, we practitioners will certainly welcome them gratefully.

According to the wave equation of physics, transverse waves — Hertzian waves with a vector field perpendicular to the direction of propagation — and longitudinal waves — scalar waves or Tesla waves with a vector field in the direction of propagation — always occur coupled together (Fig. 3).

The latter are standing waves or shock waves whose impulses are passed on by “charge carriers, some quantum structures, for example vortices” (Meyl (3)), more precisely in the form of so-called “potential vortices” (Meyl), that is, field vortices with particle character that are capable of forming structures.

This “model is based on Hermann von Helmholtz's vortex-ring model” (Meyl (4)).

There are four kinds of longitudinal waves according to their propagation speed, as quoted from Meyl; see also (22):

1.) Those slower than the speed of light, known as sound waves or plasma waves.

2.) Those travelling at the same speed as light: these scalar waves are mediated by photons, which is why it is better to describe them as vortices rather than particles.

3.) Those faster than light and with great penetrating power: here it is neutrinos that pass on the standing-wave impulse; and

4.) Those whose speed is zero: this is so-called noise, in which “standing vortices” (Meyl (3)) form as a mixture of frequencies with ever shorter wavelengths but higher frequencies — “vortex clusters” (Meyl).

At a transmitting antenna, a field vortex forms when the wave detaches from the antenna; that is, “the near field of an antenna is longitudinal” (Meyl (3); Fig. 4).

In the near field of this dipole antenna, a phase shift of 90 degrees occurs between the magnetic and electric fields, disappearing again only at a greater distance, in the far field. In other words, only there does the field vortex develop into a Hertzian electromagnetic wave: only there does it unroll from a vortex into a wave.

The reverse occurs at a receiving antenna: there, “the electric wave must ... be reflected and become a standing wave” (Meyl (3,22); Fig. 4a). According to what has been said above, these waves can thus generally be “regarded as waves rolled up into vortices” (Meyl (4)).

This also means that this standing wave is “nothing other ... than a stationary vortex” (Meyl). In other words: “A wave and a vortex are merely two different but stable states of one and the same electromagnetic field phenomenon” (Meyl).

When a signal is received at the antenna, it is no longer possible to distinguish “whether it was previously a wave or a vortex, and whether it” — the signal, author's note — “had travelled as a transverse or a longitudinal wave” (Meyl).

Tunnelling

The decay of a vortex in an antenna rod depends on its propagation speed: the faster the vortex, the more stable it is. At 1.6 times the speed of light and above, it remains stable (Meyl).

“At high speed, the vortex particle undergoes a Lorentz contraction” (Meyl (4)); that is, it becomes smaller. “These very fast vortices contract in size and can now tunnel” (Meyl (4)); “that is why faster-than-light speed occurs in the tunnelling effect” (Meyl).

For tunnelling vortex particles, “the principle of length contraction applies, which states that the faster a particle moves,

the smaller it is. Thus, the more a tunnel is constricted, the faster the longitudinal wave must be if it is to pass through it” (Meyl).

This is precisely what was measured at the University of Cologne by Nimtz with microwaves (Fig. 5), at the University of Berkeley by Chiao with photons, and at the Vienna University of Technology by Krausz with laser beams, and what I cited in (1) as photon tunnelling.

The carrier wave measured by Kunnen (37,38,62,63–65) at the RFR tube outlet (1) — a form wave at 2.373 GHz (±), wavelength 12.65, setting 7.4 on the Lecher antenna, conventionally considered a linearly polarised wave as opposed to a carried wave with different polarity intensities — can accordingly be interpreted as a longitudinal wave in which the potential vortices act as carriers for the modulated oscillation, or information.

According to Kunnen (37,63–65), however, even the classical interpretation as a linearly polarised form wave is sufficient to explain the effects observed in practice, for example an amplification effect as the cavity increases in size. These arise through the combination of a cavity resonator — here the “coaxial cable” and honeycomb holes — and a solid-body resonator, here the honeycomb.

In the experiment, the propagation speed of the so-called Tesla wave, or longitudinal wave, is approximately 1.5 times the speed of light. However, it varies according to field strength, and Tesla gives an average of approximately 471,240 km/s, as quoted by Meyl.

Only when transmitter and receiver are in resonance does an indicator lamp on the receiver light up, signalling that the transmitted energy is actually arriving. If, in the experiment, one moves out of perfect resonance or natural resonance by changing the frequency, the indicator lamp on the receiver goes out.

Only under “perfect resonance” (Tesla), where resonance is understood as synchronism between the transmitter, receiver and mediating particles, does 100% of the transmitted power reach the receiver, while others that do not enter resonance receive nothing at all, even if they are closer to the transmitter (Meyl). Only in the case of resonance does data exchange, that is, communication, take place.

The field lines emitted by the transmitter, one pole, can be collected without energy loss by the receiver, the other pole, only in the opposite phase. If they oscillate in phase, the receiver cannot receive the signals (Fig. 6): “resonant interaction” according to Meyl.

According to Meyl, only under perfect resonance does Tesla radiation exhibit an oscillating electromagnetic interaction, meaning:

a) Tesla radiation is likewise an electromagnetic wave, albeit a longitudinal one; and

b) poles oscillating in resonance attract one another just as opposite static poles do.

In the experiment, free energy is demonstrated by the fact that, under resonance, the transmitter's indicator lamp glows more faintly, and under perfect resonance even goes out, while the voltage at the receiver rises and its indicator lamp consequently lights up. “Normally”, according to classical physics, the transmitter lamp should glow just as brightly as, or more brightly than, that of the receiver. Since it does not, this means that the receiver receives more than the transmitter transmits. This additional energy can therefore come only from the surroundings: field energy is drawn from the environment — free energy.

Through this booster effect, as I have called it in relation to the RFR, more energy arrives at the receiver than the transmitter emits, owing to so-called tunnelling, see below, which is why Tesla called his apparatus a “Magnifying Transmitter”.

The resulting gain in energy occurs particularly when the amplitude of the transmitted frequency is reduced to the point at which no surplus stray field is radiated (Meyl).

“The transmitter therefore senses when its signal is being received” (Meyl). In the experiment, this is visible because the indicator lamp on the transmitter lights up the moment the receiver is disconnected, demonstrating the reaction upon the transmitter.

As stated above, longitudinal waves are electromagnetic waves. Alongside the electric form there is therefore an equally valid second form of scalar wave, namely a magnetic wave (Meyl; Fig. 7). This is probably the one of significance for information transfer during medication testing, or resonance testing.

According to Meyl, one example would be the coaxial cable, which is something like a tunnel traversed only by scalar waves of sufficient speed. This is why, in the RFR's construction, the tube with its internal Plexiglas electrode is very similar in effect to this coaxial cable (Fig. 8).

“Only one quite specific scalar wave can pass through a channel shaped in this way, which functions like a tunnel or a non-uniform waveguide” (Meyl (3)). According to experience with RFR testing, it is the wave involving “perfect resonance” between medication and patient.

In the language of unified field theory, or the theory of objectivity (Meyl), information is to be regarded as “a structure of electromagnetic vortex fields” (Meyl), meaning “that electromagnetic vortices must without exception be considered in the generation of information” (Meyl), while “the principle of duality ... in turn forms the prerequisite for the emergence of information” (Meyl).

Dielectric

According to Meyl, in an electrical conductor, in addition to the familiar current vortices, potential vortices with opposite properties also occur, “forming in the poorly conducting medium, preferably in the dielectric” (Meyl). Thus, the electrical conductivity of a medium determines “whether current vortices or potential vortices can arise, and how quickly they decay” (Meyl). In a well-conducting medium they are current vortices; in a poorly conducting medium, a dielectric with a high dielectric constant and thus low conductivity, they are potential vortices. According to Meyl, potential vortices can therefore also be called “vortices of the dielectric”.

Glass, Plexiglas and, especially, water are such dielectrics, with dielectric constants of a similar order of magnitude. The higher the dielectric constant, the better the conditions for the formation of potential vortices. Indeed, a dielectric, especially the vacuum, is the very condition for the formation of hydrotic potential vortices.

The type of cable through which energy impulses are transmitted is also important. Whereas copper cables, for example, transmit the energy impulses of potential vortices less effectively, “optical-fibre cables have a considerably higher efficiency” (Meyl (21)). This is because of the demonstrable concentration of a light impulse in an optical fibre towards the centre of the conductor, and thus towards the vortex centre with its “extremely high energy density” (Meyl), in the case of potential vortices. By contrast, current vortices in copper cables exhibit a “skin effect”, a concentration towards the periphery, meaning “a decrease in effective conductivity towards the centre of the conductor” (Meyl (21)), as opposed to concentration towards the centre, which is itself “a condition for increased potential densities and the formation of ‘hydrotic potential vortices’” (Meyl (21)). According to Meyl, the potential vortex's capacity to form structures arises as a consequence of this concentration effect (Fig. 9).

What has just been said is important in relation to the RFR, particularly because of the Plexiglas components used in it, with their high dielectric constant and thus low conductivity, and the optical-fibre cable used, with its corresponding concentration towards the vortex centre.

The term “hydrotic” in connection with potential vortices already points to the importance of water in relation to the phenomena that occur.

It is “a medium that can emit as well as transmit and receive hydrotic vortices” (Meyl), and can “preserve”, that is, store, them for a particularly long time.

Owing to its dipolar character, when a water molecule rotates it “forms a point vortex — it acts as a transmitter. Conversely, every potential vortex that encounters a water molecule will set it into rotation — it then becomes a receiver. In this way, an exchange of energy and, in the broadest sense, an exchange of information between individual water molecules appears to be possible through potential vortices” (Meyl (21)).

This is especially important for the “resonant interaction” (Meyl) between a human being, who consists largely of water, and a medication, particularly a liquid one; see below. Experience with so-called electronic homeopathy shows that transferring information into a liquid medium has a better effect than transferring it into a solid medium.

Hyperboloids

According to Meyl, the structure that forms or is present in an electric scalar wave is identical to the structure of the hyperboloids of the human ground substance, also called the matrix; see Part 1 and Heine (7) (Fig. 9a). The hyperboloid structure that forms dynamically there arises through three-dimensional layering of the matrisomes, the proteoglycan networks of the matrix, and breaks down again after the information has passed through. Moreover, the hyperboloids have “minimal surfaces”, with lipophilic receptors on the inside and hydrophilic receptors on the outside (Heine (7), Lechner (28)), allowing even just a few photons to transmit corresponding energy impulses and thus information.

So much for the physical findings relevant to our subject, some of which are disputed.

Part 3 discusses the consequences, particularly for the RFR, and identifies philosophical connections. Part 3