The RFR is more than a device that “merely” uses an optical fibre

The RFR is more than a device that “merely” uses a light guide.

Re: Report on the MFT course in Berlin.

I was pleased to read the mention of the RFR in your article about the Berlin MFT course, in which you write that the RFR “passes vibrations through a light guide” (quotation).

For substantive, professional and historical reasons, I would like to publish the following contribution on this in H&J.

The principle and essential nature of the RFR are not primarily based on transmission through a light guide.

This is merely one variant for transmitting energy and information in the sense of light transmission through biophotons during direct resonance testing, but without any substantial amplification or booster effect into the cell;

if the light-guide cable is completed into a “coaxial cable,” meaning attached to a hand electrode lying inside a tube, the booster effect arises and offers advantages in scanning, since it allows measurements into the cell nucleus (DNA).

The other variant uses the “coaxial cable” connected directly to the side or base of the RFR, with a booster effect and without any light guide.

Both variants were offered from the outset, as was the acrylic-glass block without openings on top, to enlarge the supporting surface during medication testing.

Without any connection, the acrylic-glass block—RFR, PA or SV—works only up to approximately 20 cm from the patient or client and likewise lacks this booster effect, so measurements cannot reach the cell nucleus.

Moreover, the RFR with its “coaxial cable” and openings is a cavity resonator, whereas any block without openings is a solid-state resonator with lesser physical properties.

Through the “coaxial cable,” the RFR transmits more than just light: in terms of quantum and scalar-wave physics it transmits vortices, of which light quanta are a special case (note the dispute among experts about scalar waves). The RFR's special properties can be explained only if more than “just light” is transmitted.

“Just light” is transmitted by the light guide and acrylic-glass block alone.

Transmission from one block to another during medication testing—a wonderful idea of Dietrich's—is unaffected by the above. It is based on Kunnen's phenomenon of room resonance and has nothing to do with the properties of the block itself.

Your sentence, “the English development without a light guide from one acrylic-glass block to another is found in our signal amplifier” (quotation), therefore conflates the two matters and is only partly correct. This possibility of communication works equally with every RFR type and is not a characteristic specific to the English acrylic-glass block. Rather, it goes back to Dietrich's brilliant idea of enabling communication between two acrylic-glass blocks to take place entirely wirelessly, without a light guide (see also my contributions in earlier H&J issues and at www.rossaint.de).