Article · —
Indications for the RFR, PA and SV
About this reading edition & sources
Indikationen des RFR, PA, SV
English reading editions reproduce the complete available text. Original bibliographic titles are retained.
English translation · historical German original
Read the German original · Full English translation. Original bibliographic titles are retained.
Indications for the RFR, PA and SV
The indications for the Rossaint Frequency Resonator (RFR) can be found on this website under RFR: Information (www.rossaint-resonator.com).
Regarding the comments made by Dr. D. Klinghardt in the editorial of H&J 3/2002 about the range of indications for the Photo-Amplifier (PA, now called the signal amplifier, SV) and the RFR, I would like to state the following:
Do not worry.
Nobody needs to replace an RFR they have already purchased with the “new” device unless they wish to. On the contrary, the RFR offers several additional possibilities and is even cheaper as a block.
In English-speaking countries, my RFR is also called a “photoamplifier” (PA).
Dietrich may have caused unfounded confusion among some people.
For:
1. All the applications he lists there can also be performed with the RFR. The RFR has at least the same magic built in, indeed more.
The fact that the English PA comes from Findhorn, as Dietrich wrote to me, is unfortunately no longer a guarantee of a special effect. Many of you probably already know from your own experience that, because of commercialisation, Findhorn's power is no longer as strong as it was in the founders' time.
The use of the polarising filter from auriculomedicine placed on the PA and the resulting diagnosis—for example, open or restricted regulation, and disease intensity according to the angular deviation of the emitted polarised light from the vertical—and the new use of two PAs in a room communicating wirelessly with one another were new to me. Both, however, can equally be performed with the RFR or with two RFRs.
My subsequent investigations show that the two RFRs do not need to be identical. All available variants can therefore be used, including the new medication pickup or the RFR block without any holes. The second medication pickup or RFR in the room requires no tube, although adding one to the latter would produce further boosting.
A second device is an excellent alternative for picking up medications and so forth without contact from the medication boxes and cabinets around the testing area. Anyone with an assistant can give them the second RFR and have them use it to pick up medications from more distant shelves and similar places. As long as one remains in the same room, room resonance helps, particularly in the centre of the room (carrier wave), but also to either side, though no longer with the same intensity.
Wireless communication works because of the carrier wave present in the room and in the RFR, with a wavelength of 12.65 (2.373 GHz; room resonance according to Kunnen; Lecher antenna setting 7.4).
I think the polarising filter is a very good idea, since—as in auriculomedicine—it allows the degree of a pathology to be determined precisely and, when placed on the RFR, permits checking of open regulation, switching and much more. It also makes material testing in dentistry easier and more differentiated, since a material that restricts regulation again or triggers switching again is unsuitable.
In the medical/dental physioenergetics (ZÄPE) I introduced, we have even deeper testing possibilities: access to the body's deeper yin layers to reveal chains of adaptation that have arisen throughout life, using the so-called biocomputer and particular mudras, such as the segmentation-polarity mudra. Only after we have “shut down” the adaptation chains through Beardall's so-called computer clearing does it make sense to test materials and so forth in this less distorted state, unaltered by adaptations. Otherwise, we not only remain in the superficial yang layers but, above all, test materials for the adapted state, which is precisely what we neither want nor can use.
2. I have already written about amplification itself—the booster effect—in my articles and instructions for use (see www.rossaint.de), and explained the difference between use with and without the tube (“coaxial cable”).
These show that, in the RFR without the “coaxial cable,” the advantages of phenomena known from quantum and scalar-wave physics—immunity to shielding, faster-than-light speed, “use of free energy”—are absent or quite insignificant. The effects observed in bioenergetic tests are then restricted to “light phenomena” (biophotons; physical through mental body), whereas with the “coaxial cable” they extend beyond this, and “communication” also works better with the higher energy bodies, beginning with the causal body, and their fields of consciousness. (See the article on acupuncture points at www.rossaint.de.)
If the first RFR honeycomb at the patient is used without a tube, with the corresponding disadvantages, it must stand as close to the patient as specified (see instructions). Otherwise, as before, it can stand farther from or closer to the patient according to how far the tube is “extended.” This also applies when using the polarising filter. The honeycomb simply needs one of its long edges aligned parallel lengthwise to the body's axis, as is also the case when the honeycomb is placed near the body.
Only with the “coaxial cable”—tube plus hand electrode—or mini-tube does the information reach the cell nucleus (intranuclear); with the honeycomb alone or cable alone it does not. Then it reaches only the cell's cytoplasm (intracellular).
With the “coaxial cable,” direct resonance testing therefore also goes deeper, namely into the nuclear DNA.
Everything placed on the RFR is amplified, including images, slides, materials, symbols such as mudras—including Louisa Williams's mode cards—and written words, and so forth.
We have used this advantage from the very beginning.
3. It cannot simply be said that words are converted into pure information by the PA:
Words are already information for someone who resonates with them. For someone else without resonance, they pass by and have no meaning. The RFR merely amplifies them as a cavity resonator if they resonate perfectly. They are carried by the neutral carrier wave (7.4), and as a carried wave they have positive or negative effects.
This is why, as described, the RFR also works during a psychotherapeutic or psychokinesiological session, from which the corresponding autonosode can be produced with an excellent supportive therapeutic effect. This also applies to energetic psychotherapy, such as TFT according to Callahan, EFT according to Craig, MFT according to Klinghardt and KFT according to Rossaint.
With the RFR, the Lecher antenna or BOT (bidigital O-ring test) (Omura, V. Benschoten) can be used very effectively to examine bodily material from a patient without the patient needing to be present.
4. If you are not yet familiar with the new indication for the RFR—harmonising the aura and cerebral structures in cases of electrosmog or geopathy, or energising remedies with low Bovis values—read about it on my website or request the password for the new instructions (02/03) by email.
To summarise what I currently know about the English PA, it is a possible alternative but possesses no magic of its own that the RFR does not also have.
The RFR is also available as a simple block without any holes or openings, as I have offered it from the beginning to enlarge the supporting surface.
It always depends on the consciousness with which one works at or with these devices. They do nothing on their own. (See www.rossaint.de under RFR, alles Humbug oder was?)
The English PA (signal amplifier) cannot be used for the RFR's new indications—harmonisation of the aura and cerebral structures—nor can the RFR block alone, because it has no lateral openings for inserting the necessary PMMA light-guide cables and thus does not act deeply enough into the body. This becomes possible only through the light guide, with amplification by the mini-tube or “coaxial cable.”
Because the holes are absent, the mini-tube also cannot be connected with the PMMA cable for direct resonance testing into the cell nucleus or for acupuncture-point measurement. Only through the mini-tube's boosting during acupuncture-point measurement does one obtain deeper information that cannot be reached without it. Precisely this latter measurement has shown that acupuncture points are connections between the microcosm—in this case DNA—and the macrocosm—in this case the fourth and higher levels in the seven-body model.
Since the English PA/signal amplifier is a solid block, it can only be regarded as a solid-state resonator, whereas the RFR combines a solid-state and cavity resonator and therefore has better physical properties, especially when used with the “coaxial cable.”
Even the RFR honeycomb variant without holes or cavities on its upper surface still has lateral holes or cavities for cables used in harmonisation, direct resonance testing and acupuncture-point testing. It additionally has a pyramid shape, producing a greater, fourfold amplification effect, alongside the advantage of being able to connect the “coaxial cable.” This captures more “particles,” and thus more information, than biophotons (light quanta) alone, allowing measurements in darkness and through walls as well (“Neutrinopower”; cannot be shielded; not tied solely to room resonance). With the English RA/SV, therefore, one of the two resonators—one at the patient, the other as medication pickup—must stand close to the patient (0–20 cm), whereas the RFR with the “coaxial cable” can stand correspondingly farther away. Without it, the RFR must also stand that close; see the article at www.rossaint.de.
Since the longitudinal waves important for wireless/non-contact information transmission are vortex configurations, the lack of cavities also removes this advantage from the “English” RA. The RFR, by contrast, stimulates vortex formation precisely through its cavities and thus functions as a vortex resonator (see also my articles).
Everyone will have to determine for themselves whether the quality of the material is identical by holding both variants and sensing their energy. The only certainty is that there are different manufacturers of acrylic glass.
Original / Sources
- Historical source: rossaint.de
- https://www.rossaint-resonator.com/artikel/#rfr-artikel-8